as seen in today's doonesbury

| No Comments
Was the pre-emptive military strike to remove Saddam in America's best interest? That is a question that receives a sharply divided response in our country with the trend being against the pre-emptive military action we launched. I've reached the conclusion, retrospectively, now that the inadequate intelligence and faulty conclusions are being revealed, that all things being considered, it was a mistake to launch that military action, especially without a broad and engaged international coalition. The cost in casualties is already large and growing, and the immediate and long-term financial costs are incredible. Our country's reputation around the world has never been lower and our alliances are weakened. From the beginning of the conflict it was doubtful that we for long would be seen as liberators, but instead increasingly as an occupying force. Now we are immersed in a dangerous, costly mess and there is no easy and quick way to end our responsibilities in Iraq without creating bigger future problems in the region and, in general, in the Muslim world.

   - Nebraska Congressman Doug Bereuter in the Lincoln Journal Star

(Bereuter, a Republican, will step down from his 1st Congressional District seat effective Sept. 1 after 26 years in the in the House of Representatives.)

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry published on October 14, 2004 11:21 AM.

voter registration fraud in nevada was the previous entry in this blog.

yet another proud member of the reality-based community is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.


Category Archives