Paul Boutin does some investigative digging, and comes to the conclusion that Salam Pax’s Dear Raed blog is probably for real. Read his analysis here. (Thanks, Joi!)
My gut agrees. And I have pretty good instincts. There are, in fact, a lot of subtle clues that one can use to assess whether a series of writings are authentic. It’s not an infallible process, but those of us who spend a large percentage of our time reading (grading papers, reading e-mail, participating in mailing lists, reading blogs, etc) start to develop a good sense. Authentic voice is very hard to fake. It can be done, but it takes a great deal of skillful effort. And there’s no evidence that there’s an agenda in Salam’s writing—what would be the motivation for someone to go through the significant effort involved in creating a believable virtual persona in this context?
So I’m with Paul, but for different reasons.
I got interviewed by a CNET reporter today about warblogging. Apparently, in the national “profnet” system used by reporters to identify professorial experts on topics, I’m linked with blog concepts. Cool. I gave her Salam’s URL. And Allison’s. And Kevin Sites’. We talked for quite a while, about the voice and personal connections to the net that weblogs enable. Will be interesting to see how that gets shaped into a story—if at all. Will provide a link here if it does go live.
www.flickr.com
|
